Walling Systems Comparison

COMPARISON OF 3 COMMON WALL SYSTEM

UNIT

EBLOCK AAC BLOCK

TUYNEL BRICK

CONCRETE BRICK

Applied standard TCVN 7959:2017 TCVN 1450:2009 TCVN 6477:2016
SPECIFICATION
Composition Sand, cement, lime, aluminum powder, water Clay, coal, water Dust, cement, fly ash
Dimension mm 600 x 200 180 x 80
Thickness mm 75 – 200 80
Size tolerance mm ± 1.5 ± 05 – 15
Compressive strength MPa 3.0 – 7.5 5.0 – 12.5 5.0 – 10.0
Dry density kg/m³ 460 – 700 ∼ 1500 – 1800 ∼ 1500 – 2200
Dry shrinkage* mm/m ≤ 0.2 ∼ 0.1 ∼ 2
Fire Resistance* giờ ∼ 4 – 8 ∼ 1- 2 ∼ 1- 2
Thermal conductivity W/m.K ∼ 0.11 – 0.16
(good insulation)
∼ 0.82
(medium insulation)
∼ 1.03
(poor insulation)
Sound transmission class* dB 36 – 56 28 N/A
EFFECTIVE APPLICATION
Conventional wall configuration Skimcoat EBS (3-5mm)
EBLOCK AAC BLOCK
Skimcoat EBS (3-5mm)
Sand Cement Mortar (15-20mm)
TUYNEL BRICK
Sand Cement Morta (15-20mm)
Sand Cement Mortar (15-20mm)
CONCRETE BRICK
Sand Cement Mortar (15-20mm)
Impact Similar to mastic plastering, there is no need to scrape, accelerate, reduce labor costs and save finishing supplies. Thick walls have to be scraped and tested, the risk of being cracked, the cost of laboring to plaster the cement sand is four times higher. Thick walls have to be scraped and tested, the risk of being cracked, the cost of laboring to plaster the cement sand is four times higher.
Mastic Non-requirement Mandatory Mandatory
Construction productivity m²/person /day ∼ 25 – 30 ∼ 8 – 12 ∼ 12 – 15
Block cost** % 100% ~ 85 – 90% ~ 90 – 95%
Structure costs** % ∼ 85 – 90% 100% N/A
Mortar cost % ∼ 85 – 90% 100% N/A
GREEN STANDARD
Environmental impact Green materials, a closed production process, encouraged by the government to use. It consumes 50-70 million m³ of land, 5-6 billion tons of coal and releases 20-25 billion tons of CO2 into the environment every year.

* Depends on the thickness and configuration of the wall system